Last week we gathered a group of our most forward thinking communications heads from some of the largest and smartest European companies to have a discussion around challenges facing the function.
One of the debates that really caught my attention was about company reputation. Communications heads are feeling increasingly uncomfortable with their ability to both manage and measure reputation at the very time when it is high on the corporate agenda.
Reputation is a key focus area
There were four top reasons that came out for Communications caring about reputation right now:
1) Feeling exposed. As consumers (of both products and information) have more power and ability to share their views they are quick to hit companies for doing something they disagree with. There was a feeling that the volatility in the business environment had meant that “the winds have shifted” sentiment against corporate and that feels uncomfortable, and personal, for CEOs.
2) Focus on Growth in new markets. As developed economies face slow growth many companies are looking at new markets (geographies/products) to support their growth. Company reputation can help or hinder our success in these new markets.
3) CEO focus. There are only so many scandals that Time magazine can cover before the topic of company reputation starts to feel very personal to even the most hardy senior execs. The AON Global Risk Management survey 2011 has ‘damage to reputation/brand’ as the 4th biggest risk to companies (after economic slowdown, regulatory changes and increased competition).
4) Employee sensitivity. An employee’s personal reputation is intrinsically tied to the company they work for. With many employees sharing their work details on social media sites they are increasingly open to peer questioning.
Access CEC support: 1) reputation risk management) 2) corporate brand management) 3) influencing stakeholders in a networked environment
Measurement is not up to scratch
Everyone was looking for a silver bullet that both tied communications activities to reputation and demonstrated the impact of reputation on business outcomes. Most telling was that not one person was satisfied with their current measurement strategy and it’s ability to do either (and stand up to cross-examination from the CFO.)
The challenges we heard were:
- Measurement efforts are silod – “we measure media tone and coverage, company reputation, monitor issues and social media but they are all done independently – it must be better to integrate”
- Comprehensive measurement is cost-prohibitive – “the cost of measuring reputation means that we can only cover a couple of core markets so we can’t get the full picture. In an environment where news and information has no boundaries that is a worry”
- Reputation measures are too high level - “the data we get it too high level to really influence our decision making; it rarely turns up anything we didn’t know already”
- Limited value for forward planning – “with the fast changing stakeholder environment a view looking back at what people thought isn’t always the best for helping us decide what we should do going forward”
So, why do we do it? the answer is that currently most companies feel it’s their only option to put a demonstrable numbers to what we do.
What is the right way forward? Read More »

We sit at the center of a global network of over 350 Heads of Communications and their teams. This privileged position gives us a unique vantage point into the shared challenges and priorities of executives who, regardless of industry or company size, all aim to boost the function’s performance in a wildly complex business and communications environment. Our daily conversations, executive retreats, workshops, and Q&A session on webinars, have yielded tremendous insight into the future of the function, but none quite like these!
Anyone ever tried one of those seven day cleansing diets? They usually start when you get back from a decedent vacation, stuff yourself over the holidays, or realize you’ve subsisted for a month on Chicago polishes and deep dish. You’re allowed only concoctions of stuff like lemon juice, vinegar, salt water, and mashed beets and ginger; and the expectation is that after a week, you’re miraculously cleansed, fit, and trim. Of course, any benefits don’t last, and by day eight you’re back in line with the rest of us at Big Al’s Italian Beef.
Hopefully by now we have all escaped the craze of crowded malls for the last time in 2011. We’re down to the wire—the holidays are here! That said, it’s never too late for a last minute gift for your fellow communicators.
As communicators, we like to think that we’re good at listening. But, how often do you see messaging and communications strategies that don’t really resonate with audiences? We’ve discussed how the
Today’s the day that CEC has been counting down to all year… No, it’s not the renewal date of your CEC membership – it’s our Christmas party (at least, it is in our European HQ, where I’m based). I must say, I’m looking forward to it, and most of the CEC crew assures me that they are as well. However, in speaking to several of my friends from other companies, I’ve been struck by their negativity, cynicism, and trepidation at the prospect of navigating an event that one of them described to me as “the most socially awkward of the year”.
Deciding how to prioritize our efforts in a way that best supports our business partners has always been challenging. Expectations have evolved and it’s time to break perceptions of communications as merely a service provider. Through our research into the
The end of the year is often thought of as a time for reflection — and getting things done.
The end of the year is often thought of as a time for reflection — and getting things done.